One of the things I keep seeing thrown around are that a lot of people other than R had reblogged the warning and had a link to their blog on their FR profile too, but were not suspended when R was. And so uses this as an argument that the admins are out to get her and her only. But isn't it more because someone probably reported R and not every person that reblogged the warning? If admins gets a report on something that violates TOC then of course they will take action, and I see no wrong in that.
+1
One of the things I keep seeing thrown around are that a lot of people other than R had reblogged the warning and had a link to their blog on their FR profile too, but were not suspended when R was. And so uses this as an argument that the admins are out to get her and her only. But isn't it more because someone probably reported R and not every person that reblogged the warning? If admins gets a report on something that violates TOC then of course they will take action, and I see no wrong in that.