something about their examples feels really off... idk, like style wise they don't all match up and their watermark is this giant ass signature that looks terrible. their one example of a dragon is a traced ridgeback head, that's the first major red flag.
these two are most likely to be their own art: http://m.imgur.com/XI6f4WL http://m.imgur.com/LTNmKBV
these three are dog linearts were all done by the same person,, but edited by espoir: http://m.imgur.com/2Gsl1EC http://m.imgur.com/caOUR4J the "sketch" underneath is WAY better done than the lines on top. they've slapped on some sloppy additions that are plainly by a different person, they're super shoddy. http://m.imgur.com/3jJdB4k this one they shifted the hue on as a flattened image, so the lineart looks kinda green on the edges. if the original artist wanted to tint the paws/nose/eyes they wouldn't hue shift the whole image.
and then this one? http://m.imgur.com/oUViC5Z looks nothing like the rest, and is the only "finished" looking example they have.
no subject
these two are most likely to be their own art:
http://m.imgur.com/XI6f4WL
http://m.imgur.com/LTNmKBV
these three are dog linearts were all done by the same person,, but edited by espoir:
http://m.imgur.com/2Gsl1EC
http://m.imgur.com/caOUR4J
the "sketch" underneath is WAY better done than the lines on top. they've slapped on some sloppy additions that are plainly by a different person, they're super shoddy.
http://m.imgur.com/3jJdB4k
this one they shifted the hue on as a flattened image, so the lineart looks kinda green on the edges. if the original artist wanted to tint the paws/nose/eyes they wouldn't hue shift the whole image.
and then this one?
http://m.imgur.com/oUViC5Z
looks nothing like the rest, and is the only "finished" looking example they have.
seems pretty damn fishy to me