"But if the buyer wants to use some of the tracks in the production of new work (e.g. a video), he or she has to get your permission and credit you, as you still hold exclusive and moral rights."
"new work" means, in this case, new image, not new overall project.
11. Do I always need to get permission to use other people’s work? Is it enough to credit the author/artist? If you want to use a piece of work that is still in copyright, you will need to seek permission from the copyright holder; acknowledging the author is important, but not enough. When seeking permission, remember that sometimes the copyright owner is not the original creator; it can be the record label or producer, for example.
However, there are circumstances when works can be used without seeking the copyright holder’s permission. These are known as copyright exceptions. They include fair dealing for quotation, news reporting, education, private study and parody. Each exception has very specific criteria which you must meet in order to benefit from them.
Also, you do not need to obtain permission to use works that are in the public domain.
12. What about a cover, remix, mash-up or edit? Creating your own version of someone else’s work, including editing or remixing is referred to as a derivative work. Unless you benefit from one of the copyright exceptions mentioned above or the materials you want to edit are in the public domain, you need to seek permission from the copyright holder first in order to avoid infringement claims.
I'm really confused then, if you know what work means in this context, derivative work, etc, then why the non understanding of what I quoted from the faq?
Is "UK law states that it is an infringement to adapt a work without permission" (#16) clear enough?
sa "It's just a creative thing" means "'work' means a creative 'thing', whatever 'thing' is". I didn't mean the dismissive "it's just a thing that you wouldn't understand"
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
anonrisingcocomod) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
anonrising2016-02-14 12:33 am
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)"new work" means, in this case, new image, not new overall project.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)"when I sell my work"
"do I have copyright in my work"
it's just a creative thing.
But I didn't read the whole thing, so I just found something else even more direct:
http://copyrightuser.org/topics/faqs/#11
http://copyrightuser.org/topics/faqs/#12
11. Do I always need to get permission to use other people’s work? Is it enough to credit the author/artist?
If you want to use a piece of work that is still in copyright, you will need to seek permission from the copyright holder; acknowledging the author is important, but not enough. When seeking permission, remember that sometimes the copyright owner is not the original creator; it can be the record label or producer, for example.
However, there are circumstances when works can be used without seeking the copyright holder’s permission. These are known as copyright exceptions. They include fair dealing for quotation, news reporting, education, private study and parody. Each exception has very specific criteria which you must meet in order to benefit from them.
Also, you do not need to obtain permission to use works that are in the public domain.
12. What about a cover, remix, mash-up or edit?
Creating your own version of someone else’s work, including editing or remixing is referred to as a derivative work. Unless you benefit from one of the copyright exceptions mentioned above or the materials you want to edit are in the public domain, you need to seek permission from the copyright holder first in order to avoid infringement claims.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)I know what "work" means in this context thank you very much. I also know what a derivative work is. Good on you for reading more on that FAQ page.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)I'm really confused then, if you know what work means in this context, derivative work, etc, then why the non understanding of what I quoted from the faq?
Is "UK law states that it is an infringement to adapt a work without permission" (#16) clear enough?
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)"It's just a creative thing" means "'work' means a creative 'thing', whatever 'thing' is".
I didn't mean the dismissive "it's just a thing that you wouldn't understand"
urg, I am tired and going to sleep now