ok thanks for your input they are not a bot they are super good so good they like to boast in face of others' frustration does it mean no bots were involved evar no please take a break from internet disagreements if you think "ugh bots" means "everyone who snipes successfully is a bot and they suck forever" why ppl so invested in proving there are no bots do not understand
What the hell is going on here? Nobody has any proof either way. One anon is saying, "I think people are botting because I can never grab anything." Another anon is saying, "I don't think people are botting because I have no trouble grabbing things." Both people offered up a theory and reasoning for that theory. Everybody needs to chill and stop reading whining or bragging into everyone's posts.
someone not getting what they want isn't evidence of there being bots, either
if op had just gone with 'boo i keep missing stuff :(' instead of 'im not getting stuff and it's because PEOPLE ARE CHEATING' we probably wouldnt have this shitshow
Yeah, but that does come after the 'I DIDN'T GET WHAT I WANTED BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE CHEATERS' part, doesn't it OP?
The original reply to you didn't even DENY the possibility of botters, but made an argument that 1) they've got reason to believe that it's not why you can't snipe and 2) why a bot might still be ineffective in this situation while also leaving room for a possible bot advantage
You just don't like being disagreed with and I think you might be disconnected from how childish and hostile your own behavior in this thread has been. Get some juice.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
anonrisingcocomod) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
anonrising2016-02-14 12:33 am
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 02:19 am (UTC)(link)nonny: "i'm not a bot and i get it bc i'm good"
they refuted your wrong claim. their "i'm good" is the argumentation why it's possible that it's not botting.
please take a pause from the computer if u take a simple argumentation as a personal attack ok
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 02:24 am (UTC)(link)they are not a bot they are super good so good they like to boast in face of others' frustration
does it mean no bots were involved evar
no
please take a break from internet disagreements if you think "ugh bots" means "everyone who snipes successfully is a bot and they suck forever"
why ppl so invested in proving there are no bots
do not understand
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 02:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 03:05 am (UTC)(link)well i guess people will always want to show off their epeen
even if it's just a dragon pixel game
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 03:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 04:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 02:26 am (UTC)(link)Just because one person says that they're not botting doesn't mean that bots are definitely not involved though.
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 04:21 am (UTC)(link)if op had just gone with 'boo i keep missing stuff :(' instead of 'im not getting stuff and it's because PEOPLE ARE CHEATING' we probably wouldnt have this shitshow
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 04:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 05:37 am (UTC)(link)The original reply to you didn't even DENY the possibility of botters, but made an argument that 1) they've got reason to believe that it's not why you can't snipe and 2) why a bot might still be ineffective in this situation while also leaving room for a possible bot advantage
You just don't like being disagreed with and I think you might be disconnected from how childish and hostile your own behavior in this thread has been. Get some juice.