well there is only one person happy with the situation now on AR, and it's that anon who thinks searching for items you want through A) the AH or B) forums threads (??!) is good and well compared to an actual database. they also believe the TOS is god-given law without thinking about the way it's implemented and what impacts it'll make to the playerbase.
Gee, sorry for giving people alternative places to find things? You were going on about how hard it is to find items if you don't know what they're called. I was providing you with ways to find things to use that won't get blocked so...use them or don't.
And I haven't seen anyone trying to "reason" with me, just people telling me it's too hard to find image URLs off the actual game where these items exist.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're oblivious and not malicious, so here's a tip: people don't want snide help that comes with a side of "oh and by the way you're stupid for doing this in the first place".
It doesn't matter if there are better ways to link items in bios, the fact remains that FR blacklisting kanojo was incredibly petty and anti-user, and people are rightfully pissed about it.
DA No, blacklisting tumblr or imgur would be petty and anti-user. Blacklisting a private site that re-hosts FR assets and "mirrors" site functions explicitly against the TOU, that is common business sense.
are your really da tho? if you, there are two anons here who are happy, a) search threads anon, b) TOS is law anon. Both are kinda hilarious and... don't really know what's up so. it's not like there are tons of fanmade wikis/database out there, right? every major corporation except for tiny niche dragon pixel game has no business sense.
Dear God, more than one person can share an opinion. Also wikia =/= mirrored database. If the FR wikia had the kind of functionality that people have been using kanojo for, then they would be using that instead.
Lmao, you SHOULD feel bad for saying a forum thread is a good place to find items when there's a site with an easy and logical search function right over there. Looks like the reason (ha) you haven't noticed the people trying to reason with you is because you're a dumbass who is impervious to reason and common sense.
Too bad I don't feel bad, just baffled and confused by people who think they're pulling one over on me.
Like I said, I pointed out alternatives. If you don't want to use it and get yourself angry over something like this that's perfectly fine, go be a little ball of rage.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 05:16 am (UTC)(link)well there is only one person happy with the situation now on AR, and it's that anon who thinks searching for items you want through A) the AH or B) forums threads (??!) is good and well compared to an actual database. they also believe the TOS is god-given law without thinking about the way it's implemented and what impacts it'll make to the playerbase.
All in all can't be reasoned with.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 05:23 am (UTC)(link)And I haven't seen anyone trying to "reason" with me, just people telling me it's too hard to find image URLs off the actual game where these items exist.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 07:28 am (UTC)(link)It doesn't matter if there are better ways to link items in bios, the fact remains that FR blacklisting kanojo was incredibly petty and anti-user, and people are rightfully pissed about it.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 11:14 am (UTC)(link)No, blacklisting tumblr or imgur would be petty and anti-user. Blacklisting a private site that re-hosts FR assets and "mirrors" site functions explicitly against the TOU, that is common business sense.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)are your really da tho? if you, there are two anons here who are happy, a) search threads anon, b) TOS is law anon. Both are kinda hilarious and... don't really know what's up so. it's not like there are tons of fanmade wikis/database out there, right? every major corporation except for tiny niche dragon pixel game has no business sense.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)Like I said, I pointed out alternatives. If you don't want to use it and get yourself angry over something like this that's perfectly fine, go be a little ball of rage.