Alright, let me amend my statement: I have witnessed the people who commissioned him thank him for refunding them on his profile before he deleted those comments.
Is that enough for you, my aluminum-foil wearing friend?
DA Not really, considering it took people publically calling him out in his threads to get his attention, months for those people to get their refunds at all, and he tried to open new threads to open commissions before those people even got refunded.
The scammer warning is well deserved and others have a right to be warned about whathe has done previously so they don't get ripped off by him.
nayrt but why wouldn't she be called a scammer? multiple times now she's tried to run with people's money, and some claim she still hasn't refunded them
imo if it takes this many people causing this much fuss to get a refund, you're a scammer whether you eventually begrudgingly refund them or not
Some mysterious anon (*cough* Rhea *cough*) who keeps bitching about it to keep it alive. That is the only one I ever see complaining about not getting paid every few weeks - anyways on anon. Don't get me wrong, I like gucci as much as the next person (which isn't much), but considering there is proof Rhea has been stalking her for years now and there was a lot of false info when the whole ordeal started. I am inclined to believe the only person not paid is Rhea's hateboner.
Tbh, I am sure it isn't Rhea all the time, but a few someone'\s trying to justify their dislike for her by saying "SEE LOOK! SHE IS A HORRIBLE PERSON! SHE HASN'T PAID ME BACK FROM THAT ONE INCIDENT! *foams at mouth*" I mean, if you really want your gems back, one would think that by now you would've tried to actually, Idk, talk to her? Or report it with actual proof?
The silly thing is, I think we can all agree that she handled that situation poorly and the ones who ordered from her do have a right to be mad, so to have that extra form of anger attached to it ends up hurting their case.
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 05:29 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 05:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 05:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 05:53 am (UTC)(link)Is that enough for you, my aluminum-foil wearing friend?
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 05:59 am (UTC)(link)Not really, considering it took people publically calling him out in his threads to get his attention, months for those people to get their refunds at all, and he tried to open new threads to open commissions before those people even got refunded.
The scammer warning is well deserved and others have a right to be warned about whathe has done previously so they don't get ripped off by him.
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 06:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 06:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 07:01 am (UTC)(link)imo if it takes this many people causing this much fuss to get a refund, you're a scammer whether you eventually begrudgingly refund them or not
that goes for both of them
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 07:22 am (UTC)(link)yeah nonny that was my point
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 07:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 07:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)Some mysterious anon (*cough* Rhea *cough*) who keeps bitching about it to keep it alive. That is the only one I ever see complaining about not getting paid every few weeks - anyways on anon. Don't get me wrong, I like gucci as much as the next person (which isn't much), but considering there is proof Rhea has been stalking her for years now and there was a lot of false info when the whole ordeal started. I am inclined to believe the only person not paid is Rhea's hateboner.
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-15 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 01:52 am (UTC)(link)gucci = monarque
Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 12:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: luckgandor
(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 01:59 am (UTC)(link)The silly thing is, I think we can all agree that she handled that situation poorly and the ones who ordered from her do have a right to be mad, so to have that extra form of anger attached to it ends up hurting their case.