What the fuck is up with this person and their hate-boner for Rhea? They're reblogging all of the Rhea-centric posts and spreading their excrements all over the place while ignoring logic. Do they really hate Rhea that much?
I don't know, there's plenty of others who have been more "acidic" on both sides. They've been pretty much "here's the rules, here's the proof" the whole time, which I guess if you don't like either of those could be considered acidic, but I have definitely seen more vitriolic "haters" on those posts than this person. More vitriolic "supporters" too, tbh.
i hope shes okay :/ someone just disappearing off the face of the earth without a word like this is really worrysome. i assume shes fine, since she has enough fr people she talks to that itd get out fast assumably if she was in trouble, but...still. worrysome.
(in b4 hateboner anons jump in) (you can not like someone without wishing actual irl harm on them)
tbh considering there is mention in her profile about a dead desktop, it might be just the combination of technical issues + not having any incentive to log on right now
maybe i'm optimistic but i'm pretty sure most people wouldnt want to see her physically hurt (just like most people disapprove what z did and wish they had been punished too)
One of the things I keep seeing thrown around are that a lot of people other than R had reblogged the warning and had a link to their blog on their FR profile too, but were not suspended when R was. And so uses this as an argument that the admins are out to get her and her only. But isn't it more because someone probably reported R and not every person that reblogged the warning? If admins gets a report on something that violates TOC then of course they will take action, and I see no wrong in that.
u know what gets me about this rhea drama? its over a five day suspension. five days. with the way people are talking, u would think fr staff burned down her house
Rhea drove my 13 year old cousin off the site with her fucking bullying and foul attitude so I don't give a fuck about her feelings. She's a toxic POS who has been toeing the line for years now. I *hope* she gets banned.
I don't know when liking her became cool but this rabid defense squad obviously wasn't around when she was bullying minors and bragging about it.
I hate rhea, but I agree that I feel like people are just trying to stir trouble. I can hate someone and hate that people might be trying to stir up trouble about them too. To me, both things suck.
snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 10:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 10:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 10:54 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, you could say that. They just seem to have a level of vitriol that feels so acidic.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)I don't know, there's plenty of others who have been more "acidic" on both sides. They've been pretty much "here's the rules, here's the proof" the whole time, which I guess if you don't like either of those could be considered acidic, but I have definitely seen more vitriolic "haters" on those posts than this person. More vitriolic "supporters" too, tbh.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 10:45 am (UTC)(link)still, i bit the bait and went to that blog to check out their "excrement" and all i see is some pretty simple logic on why r was warned
like, we all understand what happened, only r's squad refuse to see it
1/10 weak attempt
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 10:51 am (UTC)(link)Nah, not Rhea, she's been MIA for almost two weeks now. Not that anyone who hates her would care.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 11:01 am (UTC)(link)i hope shes okay :/ someone just disappearing off the face of the earth without a word like this is really worrysome. i assume shes fine, since she has enough fr people she talks to that itd get out fast assumably if she was in trouble, but...still. worrysome.
(in b4 hateboner anons jump in) (you can not like someone without wishing actual irl harm on them)
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 11:18 am (UTC)(link)tbh considering there is mention in her profile about a dead desktop, it might be just the combination of technical issues + not having any incentive to log on right now
maybe i'm optimistic but i'm pretty sure most people wouldnt want to see her physically hurt (just like most people disapprove what z did and wish they had been punished too)
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 11:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-18 04:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 04:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-15 02:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-15 16:18 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 02:25 am (UTC)(link)One of the things I keep seeing thrown around are that a lot of people other than R had reblogged the warning and had a link to their blog on their FR profile too, but were not suspended when R was. And so uses this as an argument that the admins are out to get her and her only. But isn't it more because someone probably reported R and not every person that reblogged the warning? If admins gets a report on something that violates TOC then of course they will take action, and I see no wrong in that.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 11:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)...plus killing all her pets that were inside her house.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 17:00 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 02:08 am (UTC)(link)That would also be a negative.
(frozen comment) Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 02:10 am (UTC)(link)Hey there! Thank you for ASSUMING that I'm them. I'm not Violent nor do I know them that well at all.
(frozen comment) Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 05:31 am (UTC)(link)Rhea drove my 13 year old cousin off the site with her fucking bullying and foul attitude so I don't give a fuck about her feelings. She's a toxic POS who has been toeing the line for years now. I *hope* she gets banned.
I don't know when liking her became cool but this rabid defense squad obviously wasn't around when she was bullying minors and bragging about it.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 05:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 06:02 am (UTC)(link)I know it's a grudge but it's not one I'm ever letting go. People who bully children on the internet are scum.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-15 12:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: snark-rising
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-18 15:35 (UTC) - Expandnayrt
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-18 18:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-16 06:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 09:21 am (UTC)(link)Whoever said I was white knighting for Rhea? I was pointing out someone who got on my nerves and looked like they were stirring up trouble.
Also, I agree with the anon above me. Unless you have the deets then I'm going to call BS on that.
Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-15 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: snark-rising
(Anonymous) 2016-07-17 02:57 am (UTC)(link)