Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me

(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, it must be Rhea sheep asking for specific deets... or it could be people who might be new to the community...

How dare people want specifics instead of being told to weed through literally thousands of posts.

Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me

(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol I think there's a difference between not wanting to search through thousands of posts (instructions above to cut the search down btw) and just going "nobody will link me so therefore it doesn't exist!!"

Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

idk, i mean i remember a little while ago when there were people criticizing the harshness of this comm, one of the things given as a rebuttal was that deets were given, that we didn't just randomly talk shit about people but that we gave proof. so i think that is part of what is good about this comm, is that we do focus on giving links and such, and generally don't tell people to find it for themselves

NTAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
But I think part of the problem is that going over Rhea wank again is like beating a dead horse.

It's there, it's on our blogs, we've provided information on how to find them, please stop asking us to bring it up. Again.

Re: NTAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 08:48 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt
that makes sense - thanks.