Re: WANKER THREAD

(Anonymous) 2016-02-20 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
"The" Rhea wank implies there's one penultimate example we can give you, anon. There's more like a billion.

In general, she's disliked because she shit-stirs like a pro, has been so amazingly antagonistic to the admin of FR on-site that it's frankly astonishing she wasn't banned two years ago, finds a way to stick her head into every drama ever, has a clique that has the awful habit of defending her by harassing people that question her, and really doesn't know when to just let shit go.

She's also one of those "speak of the devil" types. I asked this question back when I was new about 2 years ago and she showed up in thread to defend herself, leading to the whole thing devolving the way those things always do.

Re: WANKER THREAD

(Anonymous) 2016-02-20 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't have known any of this without AR, because part of my welcome committee into Nature *gushed* about her and she practically seems to run the place, so I had no reason to think she was anything other than nice.

Re: WANKER THREAD

(Anonymous) 2016-02-20 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
The people who like her cultivate her image to try to add to their group that will berate anyone who dislikes her and try to make the community against them.

It's almost like a fucking cult in some ways.

Re: WANKER THREAD

(Anonymous) 2016-02-21 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
she really likes running things and is pretty good at it, so a lot of people know her mainly through all the material help and services she provides on fr, which naturally gives them a positive image of her because her activities affect their site experience for the better.

unfortunately being good at running events and services on a petsite doesn't necessarily make someone a nice person.