Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
no way, that thread was a trainwreck

also i'm pretty sure they didn't remove it? they just unstickied it. i think the thread OP was sick of getting pings/messages about it when it had obviously been abandoned for a year.

i know someone else started trying to do a forum-based accent/skin guide in the guides subforum, but thousands of images on a thread is a total nightmare. the forum format just doesn't work at all for what a proper accent guide needs.

Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this. They unstickied it because the OP didn't maintain it anymore and was sick of the pings and pms about it.

Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Let me quote something I said, "Yeah it was really harsh, too much stuff was on it, and it hadn't been updated in forever. But it was better than nothing!"

I didn't said it wasn't a trainwreck, it was. But I understand that it would get annoying for the OP, since they got tons of messages and pings.

Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I don't really have a horse in this race, i just find it fascinating to see nonnies reactions to this range from legit bafflement and annoyance at mods for this, to people being like "lol that site was so not legit, ofc they'd ban it you dummies".

I don't particularly care about it myself, but i am one of the nonny's who find it very strange that FR is SO adamantly against user made sites that will help their userbase. To the point where they delete threads and (possibly) ban accounts over it. That seems....extreme, to me.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
Ayrt

EXACTLY! It's really extreme. I can understand why they act the way they do about it, but it's causing no harm to the site or userbase at all. If anything, it's something it helps. It's just sad to see that they try to shut down fan made things that are out there to help others.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Except that it does violate their TOS. It uses a script to scan the site, and it saves all of the images onto its own server. You say it causes no harm to the site, but I thought I'd heard that when it's collecting data for its database update it does slow things down, which I could see as being a concern to the admin.

I'm just not seeing why people are so upset about this. They may have banned you from talking about it on site, but that was an obvious step due to their disapproval of it. However, they haven't yet taken the more extreme measure that Gaia took with tektek, so you can still use it if you want to.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 09:18 am (UTC)(link)
FR has no control over what kanojo is doing with their art assets. They CAN'T be okay with offsite databases even ignoring the data collection program, because it'll come back to bite them if kanojo ever starts running ads or phishing programs. It's not good for FR to allow other people to profit off their art like that, or to promote an official-looking servive that could outright scam their customers.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
what's new, it's not like FR doesn't run annoying as fuck ads themselves. they don't want anyone to use it, build their own comparable feature. no one's profiting off their art currently. Or are you implying all fan-run wikis out there with ads to support costs are dodgy as shit. If so, I've got news for you, buddy.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
da

well there is only one person happy with the situation now on AR, and it's that anon who thinks searching for items you want through A) the AH or B) forums threads (??!) is good and well compared to an actual database. they also believe the TOS is god-given law without thinking about the way it's implemented and what impacts it'll make to the playerbase.

All in all can't be reasoned with.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
Gee, sorry for giving people alternative places to find things? You were going on about how hard it is to find items if you don't know what they're called. I was providing you with ways to find things to use that won't get blocked so...use them or don't.

And I haven't seen anyone trying to "reason" with me, just people telling me it's too hard to find image URLs off the actual game where these items exist.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're oblivious and not malicious, so here's a tip: people don't want snide help that comes with a side of "oh and by the way you're stupid for doing this in the first place".

It doesn't matter if there are better ways to link items in bios, the fact remains that FR blacklisting kanojo was incredibly petty and anti-user, and people are rightfully pissed about it.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
DA
No, blacklisting tumblr or imgur would be petty and anti-user. Blacklisting a private site that re-hosts FR assets and "mirrors" site functions explicitly against the TOU, that is common business sense.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
da


are your really da tho? if you, there are two anons here who are happy, a) search threads anon, b) TOS is law anon. Both are kinda hilarious and... don't really know what's up so. it's not like there are tons of fanmade wikis/database out there, right? every major corporation except for tiny niche dragon pixel game has no business sense.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Dear God, more than one person can share an opinion. Also wikia =/= mirrored database. If the FR wikia had the kind of functionality that people have been using kanojo for, then they would be using that instead.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Lmao, you SHOULD feel bad for saying a forum thread is a good place to find items when there's a site with an easy and logical search function right over there. Looks like the reason (ha) you haven't noticed the people trying to reason with you is because you're a dumbass who is impervious to reason and common sense.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Too bad I don't feel bad, just baffled and confused by people who think they're pulling one over on me.

Like I said, I pointed out alternatives. If you don't want to use it and get yourself angry over something like this that's perfectly fine, go be a little ball of rage.

Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
DA

it annoys me. not because of links, but because kanojo is the one place where we can easily search apparel and skins to try them on, and find full lists of stuff that's not provided on site??

the day fr gives me a full wardrobe for apparel and skins i can support them going against kanojo

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
.

Re: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/1773237

(Anonymous) 2016-03-02 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

that's pretty much what it comes down to. it's something fr currently doesn't have. if they deigned to give us that as part of the site, we wouldn't need kanojo