She refused to take down that list of people "involved" in the CS even though a ton of them weren't actually participants in fhe spying or shady behavior.
I'm on my phone so I woht be giving links but the MAJOR offences include
The 'inked' drama involving tec. She started a harassment campaign on monarques behalf when Tecs greatest offence was being a little possessive over a common aesthetic
Literally half the stuff she posts about monarque/Gucci is made up. This includes claims the monarque was sending her death threats (and this to a tumblr comm) and then offering proof by way of IPs that she couldn't actually link back to monarque and wouldn't have held up under scrutiny anyways
There's the stupid celestial senate list she published which was basically anyone loosely affiliated with arcane don. Virtually everyone on it was innocent but she made people pm her with proof of innocence to be removed at her discretion. I can only assume she was enjoying playing judge, jury, and executioner to them.
And these are only the cases that occurred to high-profile people/situations. Rhea isn't particularly good about checking her facts and will happily reblig anything that hits her drama itch. I mean, how many times does she need to fuck up before people stop giving her predatory behaviour a pass?
*if our comm is searchable all of the listed drama events were recorded her (inked went on for MONTHS)
Rhea has literally 2750 tumblr posts tagged as "flight whining" that either post or reblog FR drama. There are probably others not tagged that are lost in the sheer volume of the thousands of more innocent posts that she makes. At this point it's not even about the specific cases but a pattern of encouraging wrong-doers to be blacklisted on thin evidence and/or events from months previous. Plus all of the times that she's thrown petty tantrums at the admins for updating the rules when she's found a loophole, and not really cared who gets caught in the crossfire.
Have fun: http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/flight+whining http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/celestial+senate http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/names
1) Click on the word "anonrising" to get back to the main blog 2) Scroll down 3) Pick a Wanker Thread link !!important!! any of them !!important!! 3) Ctrl+F, type "Rhea", enter 4) congrats you found the deets
Lol I think there's a difference between not wanting to search through thousands of posts (instructions above to cut the search down btw) and just going "nobody will link me so therefore it doesn't exist!!"
idk, i mean i remember a little while ago when there were people criticizing the harshness of this comm, one of the things given as a rebuttal was that deets were given, that we didn't just randomly talk shit about people but that we gave proof. so i think that is part of what is good about this comm, is that we do focus on giving links and such, and generally don't tell people to find it for themselves
Re: Can We Just All Agree
(Anonymous) 2016-08-12 01:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: Can We Just All Agree
(Anonymous) 2016-08-12 02:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: Can We Just All Agree
(Anonymous) 2016-08-12 02:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: Can We Just All Agree
(Anonymous) 2016-08-12 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 04:03 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 05:44 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:13 am (UTC)(link)I followed Rhea drama. I've never seen any evidence of her dragging innocent people through the mud.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)The 'inked' drama involving tec. She started a harassment campaign on monarques behalf when Tecs greatest offence was being a little possessive over a common aesthetic
Literally half the stuff she posts about monarque/Gucci is made up. This includes claims the monarque was sending her death threats (and this to a tumblr comm) and then offering proof by way of IPs that she couldn't actually link back to monarque and wouldn't have held up under scrutiny anyways
There's the stupid celestial senate list she published which was basically anyone loosely affiliated with arcane don. Virtually everyone on it was innocent but she made people pm her with proof of innocence to be removed at her discretion. I can only assume she was enjoying playing judge, jury, and executioner to them.
And these are only the cases that occurred to high-profile people/situations. Rhea isn't particularly good about checking her facts and will happily reblig anything that hits her drama itch. I mean, how many times does she need to fuck up before people stop giving her predatory behaviour a pass?
*if our comm is searchable all of the listed drama events were recorded her (inked went on for MONTHS)
Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)k
good proof
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)Have fun:
http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/flight+whining
http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/celestial+senate
http://cassowarhea.tumblr.com/tagged/names
Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)Steps to find deet links:
1) Click on the word "anonrising" to get back to the main blog
2) Scroll down
3) Pick a Wanker Thread link !!important!! any of them !!important!!
3) Ctrl+F, type "Rhea", enter
4) congrats you found the deets
you're welcome
Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)Something tells me it is just another Rhea sheep, who believes she can do no wrong with evidence staring them right in the face.
Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)How dare people want specifics instead of being told to weed through literally thousands of posts.
Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-13 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA; reply to the three comments above me
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 04:44 am (UTC)(link)idk, i mean i remember a little while ago when there were people criticizing the harshness of this comm, one of the things given as a rebuttal was that deets were given, that we didn't just randomly talk shit about people but that we gave proof. so i think that is part of what is good about this comm, is that we do focus on giving links and such, and generally don't tell people to find it for themselves
NTAYRT
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 04:56 am (UTC)(link)It's there, it's on our blogs, we've provided information on how to find them, please stop asking us to bring it up. Again.
Re: NTAYRT
(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 08:48 am (UTC)(link)that makes sense - thanks.