anonrisingcocomod (
anonrisingcocomod) wrote in
anonrising2016-08-14 12:59 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#47 - And now for something completely different (Part 2: Electric Boogaloo)

This is a Star Trek anon comm now. Make it so, nonnies.
Just kidding! Since the attitude in the comm has chilled out a little, I'd like to try another post without a Wanker Thread to see how it goes. The Wanker Thread is still present on the comm, but hidden to you (for now) and will be brought back if any big drama occurs that people feel should be contained. You can still make complaints about things that annoy you on Flight Rising, but let's try and keep the vitriol at a minimum.
Oh, and welcome to The 47 Society, AnonRising!
*tosses confetti*
LATEST PAGE
REPORT A THREAD
POSITIVITY THREAD
DRAGON SALES
ART SALES
List your dream dragon!
Check for other peoples' dream dragons!
Flight Rising Color Wheel | Hatchling Range Predictor | Official Flight Rising Tumblr |
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Remember the Rules
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)Then all I'll say is don't be surprised when people challenge you for proof rather than just assumptions. Do you have any? Any at all?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)Bro I'm not the person who wrote the big-ass comment above where I accused all the nons of being Light. You need to take a chill pill bcos literally, and I mean *literally*, all I was saying is Light is known for drama so don't be shocked when people assume the nons come from light.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)Also *asterisk* for *emphasis*, what are we in the 1990--oh my go are you Te.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)Your comment: "Someone pointed out that I had assumed something wrong so I'm attacking them about something off-subject now in order to shift focus"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)idk who Te is but okay?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)You both seem like real winners tbh. So you trying to high-horse other anon is hilarious. You deserve each other.
(I said I wouldn't ask, but, Te?)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)yea honestly I'm reading thru my replies I should have just left it alone lmao. it is a bit cringy but I guess that's what arguing on anon does to ya.
but I have no clue who Te is so the other anon has to explain that one
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)http://archiveofourown.org/users/teland
Not the safest for work.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)how does one person write SO MUCH
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)Nayrthonestkt
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nayrthonestkt
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-24 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)