firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not the original firstgen dump anon, but these guys look pretty neat and thought i'd share. apologies to firstgen anon if i'm somehow stealing their thunder. also sorry if any of these guys were posted before.

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=7510556
male wind guardian, caribbean/midnight/silver (40k) (starving)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=12532877
male water nocturne, sand/soil/red (17k)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=12971434
male water guardian, sky/jade/royal (10k)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=9153437
male arcane mirror, banana/aqua/shadow (40k) (pastel goth?)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=13028066
male plague guardian, chocolate/maize/fire (30k) (dessert dragon? a chocolate orange?)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=10918092
female fire tundra, aqua/crimson/aqua (40k) (bred, two unnamed and exalted offspring)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=11206188
female plague tundra, maize/platinum/maroon (50k)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=11389347
female plague mirror, emerald/mulberry/gold (30k) (possible fandom dragon?)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=13105210
male ice fae, red/gold/brown (20k)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=8257662
female fire tundra, crimson/splash/caribbean (50k)

http://flightrising.com/main.php?dragon=4613402
female arcane fae, teal/stonewash/splash (40k)

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
NOPE not even a little stealing my thunder, lets ride off into the sunset together on a triple basic guardian <3

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
you guys should do this with low digit dragons

please

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
op

what do you guys consider old? low 7-digits or should i just look for 6 and under?

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
other firstgenanon here

i've tried in the past, but old dragons are the new hotness and i think a lot of people lurk the AH for them. it's actually easier to find old dragons because you don't have to click them to figure out their age/ID, and when you sort by price the oldest ones will always show up first.

i'm not an oldie collector myself but it seems like the easiest way to look for them is to search with a max price cap of a pretty common price point, like.. 50k or something, then sort by price descending and look at the very top ones. then maybe go down or up by 5k each time and see if anything decently old shows up. still tedious, but a little less involved than hunting for firstgens. of course you can always potentially miss old dragons being sold at weird prices, but i'm not really sure how to reach those...

maybe that's common knowledge? i haven't seen any guides on it though, so i dunno!

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
op here

as an oldie collector, i can confirm that myself and other collectors lurk the ah to snipe old dragons at low prices. nowadays it's rare to see 6-digits listed for anything lower than 100-150k, since people are starting to realize they're worth something.

also, the thing about searching by 5k increments is what i do. i switch to by 25k when i get to 100k. i usually give up after 250k because it's not worth buying to flip at this point imo.

right now, if you hover over a dragon and it says it's 2 years old, it's probably a 6-digit.

da

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
i posted a few yesterday! it was pretty much just one single 6 digit under 50k - if yall are interested in 7 digits (first 3 mil or whatever counts as low id) i could do that though

NOOOO GOD NO PLEASE GOD NO

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
7 DIGITS ARE NOT LOW IDS!! I HATE SEEING THIS IT MAKES ME WANT TO VOMIT

ONLY 999,999 AND UNDER ARE ACCEPTABLE LOW DIGIT DRAGONS

DO NOT POST 7 DIGITS AS LOW IDS IT DRIVES ME FUCKING INSANE

Re: NOOOO GOD NO PLEASE GOD NO

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
dude fuckin chill. seeing as we're in the 8 digits its ok to assume low 7s are, well, low. there have been 10 million+ dragons since the

Re: NOOOO GOD NO PLEASE GOD NO

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
*then

Re: NOOOO GOD NO PLEASE GOD NO

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
shhhh shhhhhh it's gonna be ok

old dragon collectors association uses sub 3mil as their current definition of "old", and I think anything sub 3mil is a year old now soooo... that is kinda old by FR standards. are the low 7 digits worth much? not usually, but even six months ago 6 digits weren't worth much more than your regular dragon either.

and if people want cheapass old dragon dumps the reality is its gonna be mostly low 7s, because the 6 and sub-6 digits are super in demand and hard to find for under 100k now.

Re: NOOOO GOD NO PLEASE GOD NO

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
https://36.media.tumblr.com/1d493312ef0b35befed2bf8ab1c1c453/tumblr_inline_nnuve9frpc1r5elmd_540.png

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
jesus, anon, i saw someone on the last page refer to under 3 million as counting for some collectors

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
would people be more interested in any cheaper range (like 100-200k) 6- digits moreso than bargain bin low 7 digits? I might try and take a crack at that if I get bored of firstgen hunting

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
NOOOOO SKY/JADE/ROYAL EXALTED TO ARCANIST.

I would have loved him. :(

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
op

what the heck. he was still on the market when i posted it. i'm sorry nonny. :c

Re: firstgens under 50k

(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Not your fault, OP. You are doing good work here.